Amber teething necklaces – is your child at risk?

It is a common conundrum for parents all around the world – what is the best method to help soothe my baby? While there are many ways and means out there which are both safe and effective, from gentle rocking to a tuneful lullaby, RoSPA has noticed a worrying new trend emerging among parents who are opting to use amber bead teething necklaces.

Amber teething necklace

An example of an amber teething necklace.

These eye-catching beads are made from natural Baltic amber and are placed around a baby’s neck to help soothe the pain of teething. While there is evidence to show that these beads can have an analgesic effect, there are some very serious hazards associated with the product which we wish to make parents aware of.

Baltic amber contains between three and eight per cent succinic acid. Those that subscribe to this method of soothing argue that the acid, which has been shown to stimulate neural system recovery and bolster the immune system, is released from the beads and into the baby. The succinc acid is said to have an analgesic effect, reducing the pain of teething.

While RoSPA is not in a position to comment on the accuracy of these claims, in the past concerns have been raised about amber teething necklaces representing a choking hazard. The main concern relates to the beads and clasps which can become detached. There are also inherent strangulation hazards associated with having any type of cord placed around a child’s neck, especially babies. Some proponents have argued that the risk of strangulation is mitigated by only allowing the baby to wear the necklace when he/she is awake and under supervision. RoSPA does not support his view. Aside from the fact that babies spend a substantive part of their time sleeping, RoSPA does not advocate any cord being placed around any baby’s neck at any time. Our ongoing work on the risks posed by blind cords highlights the terrible tragedies of infant strangulation and the speed at which it can happen.

amber teething necklace baby

Amber teething necklaces are placed around a baby’s neck to help soothe the pain of teething – but it could pose a choking hazard.

RoSPA is fully aware of the stress parents can be under when their babies start teething, but there are many other options out there to help soothe teething pain, such as the use of medically approved creams applied directly to the gums. Other methods include teethers and teething toys which are often filled with a liquid and are sometimes kept refrigerated before being given to a baby to chew on. In all cases, RoSPA advises parents to seek advice from health workers (even before the baby is born) on the best and safest ways of soothing teething pain.

There have been cases of amber teething necklaces being taken off the UK and European market some years ago due to choking hazards. In RoSPA’s view, the biggest problem is that these necklaces are widely available on the internet, but the fact that these products are being offered for sale and delivery to your home does not mean that they are safe for your baby.

If consumers have concerns about any products they have seen advertised, contact Citizens Advice consumer helpline, on 08454 04 05 06.

Philip Le Shirley, RoSPA’s product safety adviser.

9 Comments to “Amber teething necklaces – is your child at risk?”

  1. I am having a problem convincing my daughter of the choking hazards of the amber necklace. There has been education by the media of cords on blinds and children’s jackets, why have I not heard of the choking dangers of this amber necklace?

  2. My girls have always used amber teething beads as babies- they worked really well and we had no issues whatsoever =)

  3. So above all, if we want to keep our kids safe, we should avoid some bad habits and keep away from Baltic Amber jewellery? By the way, I want to give thanks to RoSPA.

  4. Are there actually any recorded cases of strangulation or choking caused by amber teething necklaces?

    • Thank you for your comment Gwendoline. While RoSPA is not aware of any recorded deaths of strangulation or choking caused by amber teething necklaces, this does not mean that there haven’t been any. One of the main reasons for this uncertainty is due, in part, to a lack of data.

      In 2002, the former Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) ceased to collect injury data for its Home Accident Surveillance System (HASS) and Leisure Accident Surveillance System (LASS).

      Since then, RoSPA has highlighted the problems caused by a lack of data and led the call for injury surveillance to be re-established. A central part of the campaign has been making the case for the feasibility of UK-wide injury data collection in hospitals.

      For more information on RoSPA’s campaign for injury data to be collected, visit http://www.rospa.com/about/currentcampaigns/injury-data/.

  5. What about the anklets? We have one for our daughter and it is always under a baby-grow/tights/sock and also not round the neck so wouldn’t pose a strangulation hazard – is there still an issue?

    • Hello Matt. The anklets may not pose a strangulation hazard, but they could still pose a choking hazard due to small parts becoming detached. RoSPA suggests exercising caution with all products that could pose hazards, especially to young children.

  6. Really interesting article, I had considered using amber teething necklaces for my twins as they suffer badly with teething but will certainly think again. Thank you.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: