Safer Streets for everyone – join the movement, make a difference!

Here at RoSPA, we want to see safer streets that encourage walking and cycling not only because it helps to prevent injuries, but also because it has a positive effect on a range of health-related issues, including heart disease, mental health and air pollution.

PrintMaking these links between safer roads and wider health issues are crucial. They can have a big impact on families too. Imagine being able to make the journey to school by bike, scooter or on foot without fear of being knocked down by speeding traffic. How would your children feel? Energised, happy, healthy…the list is endless.

Helping to make this vision a reality is Sustrans – which aims to help people choose healthier, cleaner and cheaper journeys and enjoy better, safer spaces to live in. This week, Sustrans is launching a new campaign for Safer Streets and needs your support. The campaign is calling for:

  • 20mph default speed limits across built up areas – this will make everyone’s route safer
  • Dedicated funding for active travel – this will provide the resources needed to transform routes and invest in walking and cycling locally
  • Stronger duties and incentives on local authorities to develop routes and promote cycling and walking.

On the Sustrans website, you can find out more about getting support for making your street safer by creating a “DIY Street” – a tool to enable communities to take vital first steps to restore their streets for people and not cars.

Earlier this year, we unveiled new guidance for road safety and public health professionals to help boost the nation’s health. The report reveals that the greatest impact can be achieved when public health and road safety teams tackle shared agendas, such as working together to reduce the speed and volume of motor traffic or introducing road layouts that encourage safe walking and cycling.Sustrans_Safetoschool

And let us not underestimate the benefits of introducing 20mph speed limits in built up areas; lower speeds make crashes less likely and less severe when they do happen and are effective at protecting people, especially children, pedestrians and cyclists from being killed or injured. They also encourage more people to walk and cycle by providing a more pleasant and safer environment.

Councils are responsible for determining where 20mph limits should be introduced and they should take advantage of opportunities to implement them where they are needed. And this is where you come in! As part of the process, councils consult and engage with local communities and other stakeholders to make sure that safer roads are prioritised where needed and that residents have input into the schemes’ development. What are you waiting for? Get involved!

Duncan Vernon, RoSPA’s road safety manager

3 Comments to “Safer Streets for everyone – join the movement, make a difference!”

  1. Being a regular visitor to Portsmouth, an early adopter of 20 mph (safety?) blanket speed limits, I’ve noted fewer pedestrians actually bother looking before stepping into the road to cross now. This occurs not just within the 20 limit roads but on 30 and 40 limit main arterial routes too. It’s not just through distraction, though increasing use of mobile devices does play a part, it seems the ‘safer’ 20 limits lull pedestrians into a false sense of safety. Children chasing footballs into the road maybe a rare event, since the xbox etc, so drivers having to perform less emergency stops are also less practised at spotting hazards. The ‘other’ reason 20 limits in towns and artificially lowered limits on A roads are becoming popular is the cost savings in roads maintenance, though councils may say otherwise, the creeping reduction in speed limits enables huge savings, and truly awful roads to be left unrepaired.

  2. Where is the evidence that 20mph sign only speed limits result in signifcantly lower speeds and reduce accident risk? There is undoubtedly a link between vehicle speed and injury severity but the link between reduced vehicle speeds and the risk of accidents happening is tenuous at best, especially for the level of speed changes likely when dropping a speed limit from 30 to 20mph. There is plenty of evidence out there that drivers do not respond well to sign only speed limits, as they tend to base their speed choice on the surrounding environment. There are certainly areas where 20mph limits will work (where speeds are already close to this), but the calls for blanket limits are misguided and I fear may actually result in some streets being less safe than at present (larger Std Dev in 85%ile speeds). In the road safety engineering profession, it is accepted good practice that remedial actions should have a measurable positive effect backed by evidence or research. Unfortunately, in this case, this premise seems to have been overlooked. I expect better from RoSPA.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: